“Podster”
I recently became a “podster”. A podster is an individual who owns an iPOD of any color or size. I assume the size and color one chooses does infer something about a person’s personality but that can be researched at another time.
iPods’s are at the heart of the most recent high tech revolution “IPOD Revolution. iPOD”. iPOD sales have even surprised Apple. In 2004 ten million people bought iPods, and became apart of the podster revolution. The iPod is renowned for its elegant appearance, large storage capacity, fabulous colors, free tunes software and its small compact design. The iPod is advertised as a music device. Its compact size and lightweight allows a person to easily take it with them anywhere. It is also capable of being connected to different devices through which one can listen to music e.g., car stereos, speaker’s etc.
The iPod is not only popular with the younger music savvy generation. Many capabilities are attracting older podsters. Although many buy the iPod simply to disseminate their music, the iPod is capable of so much more. A renowned university in the USA, Duke, gave each of their new students iPOD’s loaded with handy information on starting at the school. Thus it is apparent the iPod can be used to carry music and homework. The iPod can also function as an excellent hard drive. One can also download popular books and the daily newspaper onto the Pod. The pod is a revolution unto itself.
With the wide spread dissemination of the iPod, the demand has exceeded the supply (reference
) although one might believe the Music industry would embrace the rise of the iPod, the opposite is occurring. Music Companies and Producers claim the iPod is partly responsible for the amount of music, which is now being illegally downloaded via the Internet.
In the twenties, the music industry pursued an Act of Congress to stop radio broadcasters from playing their music because they felt if people listened over the radio they would have no need to buy their music. The next step they took was to try and tax blank cassettes because these might be used to record music. Naturally they had the same issue with blank DVD’s. Shawn Fanning’s invention of file sharing, entitled Napster, was another issue of great concern to the RIAA. What RIAA is not aware of is that they are constantly declaring war on their greatest customers, on those that want their music the most (Reference).
I am opposed to music being downloaded illegally. I do believe that artists should receive compensation for their work. Furthermore, we must acknowledge that it is more than just the artist who is suffering from illegally downloaded material. Managers, record labels, art directors, music engineers and many more also receive money from the sale of music. The RIAA needs to re-think how to disseminate music for profit. The RIAA needs to accept that technology is here to stay and find a way to work with new technology and not against it.
